Can area delimitation and tube type impact microshear bond strength of adhesives to dental substrates?

Authors

  • Carine Weber Pires
  • Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
  • Fabio Zovico Maxnuck Soares
  • Anelise Fernandes Montagner
  • Rachel de Oliveira Rocha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46919/archv4n1-029

Keywords:

dentin-bonding agents, adhesive systems, dentin, enamel, microshear bond strength

Abstract

Background he need of delimiting the bonding area on microshear bond strength (µSBS) test remains an unclear issue. In addition, there are different types of tube to perform the resin composite cylinders on µSBS test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the adhesive area delimitation and type of tube used to build up specimens for µSBS testing of adhesive systems, to enamel and dentin.  Methods 120 bovine incisors were ground to achieve flat buccal enamel (n=60) and dentin (n=60) surfaces. Specimens of each substrate were randomly allocated into 6 groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system-a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) applied in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes– and type of tube used to build up the specimens: starch and polyethylene. 4 resin composite cylinders (Filtek Z250) were made on each surface; in 2 of them the area delimitation was performed. The specimens were subjected to µSBS test after 24 h of water storage at 37°C. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). Results The delimitation of the adhesive area did not influence on the bond strength to dentin (p=0.349) nor to enamel (p=0.158). The type of tube differently affected the ranking of adhesives in both substrates. Conclusions The delimitation of the adhesive area does not influence on the µSBS to enamel and dentin, irrespective of the tube type used to build up the resin composite specimens. The tube type’s impact on the bond strength depends on the dental substrate and adhesive system.

References

Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100-121.

Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent. 1989;17(2):61-67.

Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e50-62.

El Zohairy AA, Saber MH, Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel. Dent Mater. 2010;26(9):848-854.

Shimaoka AM, de Andrade AP, Cardoso MV, de Carvalho RC. The importance of adhesive area delimitation in a microshear bond strength experimental design. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(4):307-314.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):118-132.

Foong J, Lee K, Nguyen C, et al. Comparison of microshear bond strengths of four self-etching bonding systems to enamel using two test methods. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):252-257.

Andrade AM, Garcia EJ, El-Askary FS, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Grande RH. Influence of different test parameters on the microshear bond strength of two simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):323-331.

Tedesco TK, Montagner AF, Skupien JA, Soares FZ, Susin AH, Rocha RO. Starch tubing: an alternative method to build up microshear bond test specimens. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(4):311-315.

Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez IV, Loguercio AD. Prefabricated veneers - bond strengths and ultramorphological analyses. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(2):137-146.

Mobarak EH, Ali N, Daifalla LE. Microshear Bond Strength of Adhesives to Enamel Remineralized Using Casein Phosphopeptide Agents. Oper Dent. 2015;40(5):E180-188.

Tedesco TK, Garcia EJ, Soares FZ, Rocha R de O, Grande RH. Effect of two microshear test devices on bond strength and fracture pattern in primary teeth. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(6):605-609.

Tedesco TK, Soares FZ, Grande RH, Rodrigues-Filho LE, Rocha RD. Effect of cariogenic challenge on bond strength of adhesive systems to sound and demineralized primary and permanent enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(5):421-428.

Münchow EA, Bossardi M, Priebe TC, et al. Microtensile versus microshear bond strength between dental adhesives and the dentin substrate. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013; 46: 95-99.

Zhang L, Wang DY, Fan J, Li F, Chen YJ, Chen JH. Stability of bonds made to superficial vs. deep dentin, before and after thermocycling. Dent Mater. 2014;30(11):1245-1251.

McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, et al. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomater. 2002;23(17):3603-3608.

Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(7):765-776.

Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):379-395.

Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1416-1427.

Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater. 2009;25(10):1187-1194.

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: Better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(5):339-344.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010;26(12):1176–1184.

Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, et al. Effect of prior acid etching on bonding durability of single-step adhesives. Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):426-433.

Goracci C, Rengo C, Eusepi L, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of selective enamel etching on the bonding effectiveness of a new all-in-one adhesive. Am J Dent. 2013;26(2):99–104.

McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):410-417.

De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003;16(6):414-420.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04

How to Cite

PIRES, C. W.; LENZI, T. L.; SOARES, F. Z. M.; MONTAGNER, A. F.; ROCHA, R. de O. Can area delimitation and tube type impact microshear bond strength of adhesives to dental substrates?. Journal Archives of Health, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 337–351, 2023. DOI: 10.46919/archv4n1-029. Disponível em: https://ojs.latinamericanpublicacoes.com.br/ojs/index.php/ah/article/view/1308. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2024.